On 06/12/2012 12:47 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 12-06-2012 12:23, Tobias Pankrath wrote:Currently .di-files are compiler independent. If this should hold for dib-files, too, we'll need a standard ast structure, won't we?Which is a Good Thing (TM). It would /require/ formalization of the language once and for all.
I do not see how this conclusion could be reached.
