On 6/16/12 10:26 AM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
'Elements of Programming' is an amazing book by Alexander Stepanov and
Paul McJones ( M. Stepanov is the primary designer of the C++ STL ).
[snip]
So without further ado, here is my humble first attempt
https://github.com/gchatelet/phobos/blob/traits_concepts/std/traits2.d
And the associated more readable DDoc
http://bbteam.fr/traits2.html
I would like to hear what you think.
This is a good idea because the traits are useful within and outside the
algorithms discussed in EoP.
However, I don't think we need to abide strictly to the nomenclature
(e.g. some of the stuff in EoP was already defined with a different
name) although some EoP names are more mathematicky (such as "Codomain"
vs. "ReturnType"). One issue is when EoP goes off and defines its own
terms such as "regular type", which is usually known as "value type". In
fact, "regular type" means something completely different in PL
research. EoP's terminology didn't catch up outside C++ and sometimes
outside a small group within it.
If I'm allowed to venture an opinion on EoP itself, it's an interesting
book but I don't find it as big or great as some of its fans believe.
It's not breaking any new ground, instead it explores more along already
well-trodden territory, and it fails to find new mother lodes. Some
(many?) chapters (such as transformations and orbits) describe some
self-important notions but fail to demonstrate their general
applicability. Nevertheless, the code really is exquisitely written, and
studying it has significantly changed my approach and style in
implementing algorithms.
Andrei
