On 20 June 2012 15:07, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20/06/12 14:31, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> Hands are tied, sorry. > > > Is this planned as a short-term change for which a long-term solution will > be developed, or is it likely to be a permanent split with DMD? >
Likely permanent move away from having the a good portion of the frontend one big special case for i386. I don't see it as a huge problem though. However one or two people in IRC have asked if the GDC Extended Assembler could be renamed to __gcc_asm or __asm to make it a special / reserved feature of GDC, rather than competing with the D spec's namespace. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
