On 06/22/12 21:13, David Nadlinger wrote: > This is not to say that I don't find the std.typelist concept > interesting. We just should be very clear on how to go forward with > »meta« algorithms in Phobos before going forward with this. Developing > std.typelist and std.typetuple side by side, and then at some later > point also introducing std.meta doesn't make much sense, in my eyes.
+1, I'd add std.typecons to this list ( std.typecons.Tuple in particular ). The boundaries of each of those modules are kind of blurry and overlapping.
