On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 at 11:24:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
It's time to start voting on its inclusion into Phobos. The voting ends at 25-26 June.
There is a serious @safe-ty issue with the current implementation: randomUUID/parseUUID are marked @trusted, but take an arbitrary range as template parameter, the methods of which might be @system.
I'm aware that this mistake is astonishingly easy to make, and that code like that can be extremely tiresome to get right – there is no way to mark only a part of a template function @trusted, so you can rely on inference for handling cases where safety depends on the template arguments. I should really try to find the time to finish my @trusted rant post soon…
However, under the assumption that the aforementioned issues will be fixed, I vote for Yes. The library is nothing spectacular, and I haven't had a chance to use it myself yet, but it seems like a solid, well-documented implementation.
David
