On 7/5/12 2:38 PM, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 18:33:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Count me as interested.
CTFE needs more correctness & speed though. So to put it blantly - no
it's not possible right NOW.
BUT it doesn't prevent us from planing and doing a proof of concept.
Pegged seems a good starting point even if we end up re-writing it
from scratch.
IMO, first priority is to make code generated by Pegged work fast, and
second priority - make code generation itself fast.
Well I'd say there are things like supporting large, realistic grammars
without blowing up or taking long compilation times is the first priority.
Andrei
