On Sunday, 8 July 2012 at 09:14:32 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 08-Jul-12 13:05, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Yup, LL(*) is my favorite so far.
That's Terence Parr's discovery, right? I've always liked
ANTLR, so if
PEGs turn out to have issues LL(*) sounds like a promising
alternative.
We should also consider using GLR if LL(*) doesn't work.
GLR ... are you serious? It still does parsing in n^3 if I'm
not mistaken.
http://www.antlr.org/papers/LL-star-PLDI11.pdf describes some
disadvantages of GLR with respect to LL(*).
