On Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 04:15:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Required reading prior to this: http://goo.gl/eXpuX
Referenced post (for context):
The problem is not only in the constness of the argument, but
also in
its purity, safety, and throwability (although the last two can be
worked arround easily).
I think we're looking at the wrong problem here.
If we're trying to escape problems with 'const' Objects by
removing the members form Object entirely, that should be raising
a red flag with const, not with Object.
