On Friday, July 13, 2012 08:50:03 Benjamin Thaut wrote: > Move semantics in C++0x are quite nice for optimization purposes. > Thinking about it, it should be fairly easy to implement move semantics > in D as structs don't have identity. Therefor a move constructor would > not be required. You can already move value types for example within an > array just by plain moving the data of the value around.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4200190/does-d-have-something-akin-to-c0xs- move-semantics http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6884996/questions-about-postblit-and-move- semantics - Jonathan M Davis
