On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:18:22 -0400, Mehrdad <[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 03:57:21 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:51:22 -0400, Mehrdad <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Friday, 13 July 2012 at 02:19:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That raises an interesting point. With these changes, what should
opEquals' signature be for classes?
How about inout?
No. opEquals returns bool.
-Steve
I meant more like
bool opEquals(inout Object other) inout;
inout is meant to transfer the constancy of a parameter to the constancy
of the return value. During function execution, inout is treated as
another flavor of const (i.e. not modifiable).
The above function is basically equivalent to:
bool opEquals(const Object other) const;
-Steve
