On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/13/12 3:49 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail@**erdani.org<[email protected]> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> On 7/13/12 3:36 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: >> >> The initial question was: why does DMD 2.059 reject this if this >> makes >> sense? >> It's not even a new feature. It's a (possibly) new (and apparently >> sensible) use case of an existing feature. >> >> >> I think the simple answer is there was no provision for it. The >> feature copies the Java feature, and I don't think Java has >> something like what you defined. >> >> Andrei >> >> >> Well, the nested classes are pretty much useless without this feature. >> Except for translating Java code. If I had multiple inheritance, I'd >> just make the Apple as base class and have all the seeds virtually >> derive from it. Not having multiple inheritance drove me to try the next >> best think. And after it failed, I complained about it.. And here we >> >> are. Is it a difficult thing to fix? >> > > I don't know, you may want to submit an enhancement request. > > Andrei > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8389 Anyone who thinks this is important, please vote up. -- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.
