On 7/15/2012 4:53 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On 16/07/2012 01:07, Walter Bright wrote:
It needs to stop completely.
No. It hasn't been made for no reasons.
But yes, some code is broken in the process. This is exactly why we need a more
sophisticated versionning process (note the recurring pattern in my posts :D ).
The fact that some people have legacy code shouldn't stop D progress. But with
the current system, D must either break code or make no progress.
Changing names is minute progress, and is too costly in terms of annoying
existing users and breaking their code.
