On Monday, July 16, 2012 09:47:50 David Nadlinger wrote: > On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 06:27:13 UTC, Mehrdad wrote: > > On Sunday, 15 July 2012 at 20:01:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> Ideally, we wouldn't even need opApply anymore > > > > AFAIT, that's impossible. > > > > Not because of D […] > > How else woud you implement things like parallel foreach, …?
As I said, _ideally_ we wouldn't need opApply, but ranges fail to be able to work in every use case that opApply does. As great as ranges are, there _are_ some cases where ranges are insufficient. So, we still have opApply. - Jonathan M Davis
