On Tuesday, 17 July 2012 at 15:08:18 UTC, David Piepgrass wrote:
I want to imitate golang's interface in D, to study D's template. I wrote
some code: https://gist.github.com/3123593

Now we can write code like golang:
--
interface IFoo {
   void foo(int a, string b, float c);
}

struct Foo {
   void foo(int a, string b, float c) {
       writeln("Foo.foo: ", a, ", ", b, ", ", c);
   }
}

struct FooFoo {
   void foo(int a, string b, float c) {
       writeln("FooFoo.foo: ", a, ", ", b, ", ", c);
   }
}

GoInterface!(IFoo) f = new Foo;
f.foo(3, "abc", 2.2);

f = new FooFoo;
f.foo(5, "def", 7.7);
--

It is also very naive, does not support some features, like out/ref parameters, free functions *[1]* and so on. The biggest problem is downcast
not supported. In golang, we can write code like*[2]*:
--
var p IWriter = NewB(10)
p2, ok := p.(IReadWriter)
--

Seems [p.(IReadWriter)] dynamically build a virtual table *[3]*,because the type of "p" is IWriter, it is *smaller* than IReadWriter, the cast
operation must search methods and build vtbl at run time.

In D, GoInterface(T).opAssign!(V)(V v) can build a rich runtime information to *V* if we need. But if *V* is interface or base class, the type information not complete. So, seems like I need runtime reflection? and how can I do this in D? I did not find any useful information in the TypeInfo*.

------
[1] free functions support, e.g.
--
interface IFoo {
   void foo(int a, string b, float c);
}
void foo(int self, int a, string b, float c) {
   writefln("...");
}

GoInterface!(int) p = 1;
p.foo(4, "ccc", 6.6);
--
In theory no problem.

I, too, was enamored with Go Interfaces and implemented them for .NET:

http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/87991/Dynamic-interfaces-in-any-NET-language


Interesting article, but why not just make use of "dynamic" interfaces?

--
Paulo

Reply via email to