On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 at 07:03:05 UTC, Chris NS wrote:
I can't help thinking it sounds rather like a job for... named parameters. Just imagine it:
Yeah, that could do it too, but named parameters have been brought up a few times too and there's opposition to it. I kinda prefer the struct to named params anyway because you can store it for later too. But I could go either way.
