On Sunday, July 29, 2012 02:54:29 David Nadlinger wrote: > On Sunday, 29 July 2012 at 00:51:57 UTC, dsimcha wrote: > > Is there some reason why none of this stuff is being reviewed? > > Lack of people volunteering to manage a review.
That and a lack of people asking. Reviews seems to have happened when either the author puhes enough to get someone to volunteer or someone looking at the review queue and volunteering to review. But since it's rarely the case that we review something as soon as it's ready, it tends to sit there and get forgotten by the time that we actually finish whatever review is currently going on, and then nothing is review.d - Jonathan M Davis
