On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 07:53 +0200, Era Scarecrow wrote: > > On Monday, 13 August 2012 at 04:25:19 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: > > > Am Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:38:01 +0200 > > > schrieb Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]>: > > > > > >> On 8/13/12, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > http://blog.coldflake.com/posts/2012-08-09-On-the-fly-C%2B%2B.html > > >> > > >> http://dlang.org/rdmd.html > > > > > > Aw come on, that is not a shell > > > > Isn't rdmd just a wrapper for the compiler, then calls the > > compiled code (or previously saved version of it) afterwards? > > (That's the impression I get anyways) > > Shells such as Python, Scala, etc. are good for some one-off experiments > and tasks, but I think in general they are over-rated in general > usefulness. Much better for non-trivial experimentation is to have a > super-lightweight editor/execution. Groovy has GroovyConsole, Python has > IDLE. Personally I find Emacs/rdmd excellent as an experimentation > combination for D codes. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > I just use http://dpaste.dzfl.pl for my quick testing. I do miss not having vim keybindings but I do gain dmd-git support without the pain of setting it up locally. I'm often testing stuff during a discussion in #D IRC so the site makes it much easier to share as well. BA
