On Friday, 31 August 2012 at 05:24:31 UTC, Tommi wrote:
...But, actually it seems that the language is a bit broken, because it doesn't follow neither one of those two options. What it actually does is this:
Obviously I don't think that the language is broken, but the compiler is. I wrote that before I had seen that the third test case (S3) results a compile-time error. At the time I wrote that I assumed it would just call .fun(*ptr3)
