On 2012-09-02 03:21, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Wow, so it's basically reinventing static typing poorly. You've got the boilerplate and verbosity of a poorly-made static type system, with very few of the benefits (ie, IDE-awareness and nothing else).I'll never understand the dynamic world.
You can of course build a tool that does type checking if you use these kind of comments. Something like Dart seems to do, but Dart has built-in support for static types.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
