On 9/10/12, Sönke Ludwig <[email protected]> wrote: > Of course it's not a type... but A.B is. It's also not that important, > but it feels slightly inconsistent and coincidential that the clamps are > used here to separate the new expression from the rest.
It prevents ambiguity and hijacking. If 'x' of B ends up being a type or an alias of a type you'll end up instantiating something else instead of the B class.
