Le 19/09/2012 20:09, Dmitry Olshansky a écrit :
On 19-Sep-12 15:52, monarch_dodra wrote:
I realize *why* the "default" constructor had to go, but "no-arg" didn't
have to go with it. I think it was an accident to let it go, and we
should be trying to fix this.
I do not feel that there is a lot of reference-like types that take 0
arguments at construction. Any meaningful examples?
A use case I encountered more than once is interfacing with C++.
Another is to create an argument-less initializer that forward to
another one with default arguments.
