On Thursday, 20 September 2012 at 19:56:48 UTC, Jonas Drewsen
wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to allow the same for function templates
as well: <snip>
What am I missing (except some code that needs chaging because
only param type and not name has been specified in t?
I can't see any implementation issues with it, but I think
templates should be an explicit choice when writing functions.
Like it or not, templates still cause a lot of code bloat,
complicate linking, cannot be virtual, increase compilation
resources, and generate difficult to understand messages. They
are a powerful tool, but need to be used wisely.
