On 9/29/2012 1:08 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
As you can see, no matter what you think of these features, the arguments are pointless because it is very clear that you can do meaningful work without them. We get by without channels, homoiconicity, and full program type inference; just as the Go programmers get by without generics.
I think that argument is making the claims that: 1. all features are equally valuable 2. if one can get by without a feature, then that feature is not needed Both of those are invalid.
