Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Monday, 1 October 2012 at 09:17:52 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 29 September 2012 at 02:11:12 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
Also this reminds me of the utter uselessness of the current behavior of
"%s" and a pointer - it prints the address.
Why not specialize current "%s" for character pointer types so it will
print null terminated strings? It's always possible to cast to void*
to print an address.
It's not safe to assume that pointers to characters are generally null
terminated.
Yes, but programmer should know what he's passing anyway.
