On 10/3/12, Jakob Ovrum <[email protected]> wrote: > writefln cannot be @safe if it has to support an unsafe format > specifier. It's "hidden" because it affects every call to > writefln, even if it doesn't use the unsafe format specifier.
Ah damn I completely forgot about @safe. I tend to avoid recent features.. OK then I think my arguments are moot. Nevertheless I can always define a helper function for my own purposes I guess. Sorry Walter for not taking @safe into account. :)
