On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 03:49 +0200, Jesse Phillips wrote: […] > So, you are saying that these examples are exhibiting the same > problems because they are based on the same design? > > I don't see how that would invalidate the results. That is, I > don't see the relevance here.
My comment relates to Jeff's point that what you find is determined by what you are looking for. Also that what people write is determined by what they have been told is good and so the use of GoF patterns is what will be found now as then. No commentary was intended on any previous posts in the thread. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
