On Thursday, October 04, 2012 23:56:15 Tommi wrote: > > As it stands, there's a good chance that the comma operator is > > actually going to be _removed_ from the language (aside from > > specific use cases such as inside for loops). So, I don't think > > that there's much chance of it being expanded at all. > > I don't see a problem there. I mean, if the comma operator is > kept in specific cases like inside for loop, why not keep (and > expand it's use) it in this specific case of if-clause.
You will have a hard sell with _anything_ involving commas other than tuples. Most people consider anything like the comma operator to be evil (or at least very undesirable). - Jonathan M Davis
