On 12-10-2012 04:05, Chad J wrote:
On 10/11/2012 10:35 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 11-10-2012 14:42, Chad J wrote:
On 10/11/2012 01:40 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
I suppose a simple D_Volatile version identifier will do, like we have
D_SIMD for core.simd.__simd.
Cool.
OK, updated.
I do have a critique for your description:
Compilers that support these intrinsics must define the D_Volatile
version identifier. Compilers that do not may support them, but
programmers should not rely on it.
I read this as meaning:
Compilers that support volatile intrinsics must define D_Volatile.
Compilers can support volatile intrinsics without defining D_Volatile.
And I see a contradiction ;)
Oops. It should be clearer now.
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
[email protected]
http://lycus.org
