On Friday, 12 October 2012 at 09:42:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That sounds like a decent solution to me, but I think that there's a good chance that Walter would reject it on principle (since in general, skipping
the invariant pretty much defeats the purpose of having one).

But he already suggested implementing a _custom_ mechanism for skipping the invariant somewhere else in this thread (i.e. a "valid" flag) which is arguably even worse…

David

Reply via email to