On 10/15/12 9:47 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And if SortedRange is changed to provide access to its underlying range via a member named source (it was recently suggested by Andrei that we should standardize on doing that where appropriate), then it could become a one- liner:auto result = sort(array(range)).source;
Yes, I think we should move toward the ".source" convention for all applicable ranges, e.g. retro.source yields the original range etc.
Andrei
