On Friday, 19 October 2012 at 21:22:28 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Friday, 19 October 2012 at 21:09:05 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
So am I missing something, or was the sample case above
overlooked when
making the "private must be non-virtual" decision?
According to TDPL, this should be legal. In particular, there is
an entire section about it regarding NVI.
No idea what it going on, but I'm curious for answers.
It's a bug.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4542
