On Sunday, 21 October 2012 at 02:34:03 UTC, Matt Soucy wrote:
On 10/20/2012 09:55 PM, 1100110 wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2012 at 00:13:30 UTC, Chris
Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
On Saturday, 20 October 2012 at 07:28:07 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Not a big deal, but does anyone have or know of a usable
up-to-date
protocol buffers implementation for D? All I've found is
this:
https://256.makerslocal.org/wiki/index.php/ProtocolBuffer
But it's old, says its status is only "mid-implementation",
has no
license info, and I think it might be D1.
It has been started at least three times that I know of, but
I don't
think anyone ever finished such a beast (I'm guilty of one of
those
myself). But in related news, in case it fits what you're
hoping to
do, I've written a binding, and am in the process of a
wrapper, for
zeroMQ: https://github.com/csauls/DZMQ
It is usable in the simplest sense as is; so maybe if you're
willing
to roll your own object<->string conversions, this would be a
start.
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
Hey man, If it helps you out: steal anything you want from
these.
I didn't check how far along you were, soo... yeah.
https://github.com/1100110/CZMQ
https://github.com/1100110/ZeroMQ
I'll definitely look through CZMQ once I get a little further
with what I already have planned. Thanks.
Huh. I've also been writing a D wrapper for 0mq. As it is right
now, though, it's really just OOP wrappers for the Deimos
bindings, because I figured that it would be easiest. I should
check out the CZMQ stuff you have and see if any of it is
something that I would find useful for my projects.
Up until about a week ago, I didn't even know about zeromq. ;)
A friend of mine requested that I write this, because the company
he works for (iostudio.com) might then consider using D for some
in-house work. Crossing fingers, for D's sake. Since I'm
writing my wrapper as per his request, we might end up with very
different products. Competition is a good thing, right?
Researching and working on this leads me to think I'm going to
want to use zeromq quite a bit myself, going forward.
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
