On 10/22/2012 9:26 PM, timotheecour wrote:
> Another point is that we are sometimes too lazy to write statements as
follows:
> version (linux){ version = linuxOrBSD;}
> version (BSD){ version = linuxOrBSD;}
> version(linuxOrBSD){do_something;}
> (that's ugly but it's the official recommended way; much more verbose than:
> version(linux || BSD){do_something;}
> )
1. Verbosity is not the enemy. Clarity is the goal.
2. The example would be better as:
version (linux){ version = Something;}
version (BSD){ version = Something;}
version(Something){do_Something;}
where Something is the name of the feature being enabled. With careful selection
of Something, the code can be quite readable.
