RE: [digitalradio] Re: CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope)

[Rick Williams]

Joe,   Did you find that to also be true with Multi-PSK?   I have also tried many different software and hardware CW decoders since they became available a couple of decades ago, e.g., the Kantronics UTU, etc. and later software only solutions.   Thus far, none of them have been able to do as well with a bad fist as Multi-PSK. This was not a "scientific" test, but you do get a feel for how well decoding is taking place. And Multi-PSK was able to read stuff that I would nearly put in the QLF category.   73,   Rick, KV9U -----Original Message----- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe Ivey Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 17:02 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: CW decoding comparison (MPSK, Mixw, Hamscope) Patrick,   I have used the Pakrat software and you can have the receive to follow the speed and have the transmit to follow the receive or set the transmit speed to a desired speed. I have also tried just about all of the soundcard software's out there and I really can't tell enough difference to say which is better than the other. All of them copy well with a good fist when there is not much noise. qrm ect on the band. None will copy with a sloppy sent fist. The tnc is a old PK-232 of about the 1980 era.   Joe W4JSI   The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com SPONSORED LINKS Hobby and craft supply Craft hobby Hobbies and crafts Ham radio YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.