jivey wrote: > There are two ways to settle all of the crap. > 1. Just turn "ALL" the ham bands over to the e-mail jockeys and the rest > not be allowed on the bands. > 2. Set up frequencies for each band so all the e-mail jockeys could do > their thing and let everyone else alone. > > Joe > W4JSI > > Joe, I know that this subject is disturbing to many of us but the problem lies in responsible operating practices. I have used and have donated equipment to those that use PACTORlll. I don't find the problem in the use of the the automatic control of stations. I find the problem in that these stations are being used for things that are outside of the framework of amateur radio. Certainly those that have a legitimate use for such a system..IE HAMS ..should be able to communicate. I totally agree that there is use of the system that is not relevant to HAM radio. This should be abolished at once. Now how does one do this. The only logical way at the moment is to make the PACTOR lll available to all. In that way amateurs can see what is being sent and make good arguments against such transmissions. Just my humble thoughts. 73 David
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
