Howard,
 
You know as well as I do that a  voluntary band plan will not work. Most all these Winlink folks are going to use what ever frequency that want to as long as it is legal or close to it anyway.
 
Joe
W4JSI
 
Age is mind over matter
If you don't mind,
it does not matter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RM-11306 Rant

Tim:
 
You ignore the fact that PSK31 in the USA on 40M is smack in the middle of other countries allocations for other modes...We QRM their QSO's with PSK just like they QRM us with other modes.. its a 2 way street...
 
I would love to have world wide agreement on a bandplan...which is possible if we go to Regulation by Bandwidth so that we can be compatible with the rest of the world..
 
You are totally misreading the RSGB, Denmark and Swiss Documents... No where do they suggest that they return to the bad old days of regulation by mode... nor do they suggest that it is Chaos...in fact they are quite pleased with the results and the RSGB has just published their latest voluntary bandplans....
__________________________________________________________
Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LA
Website: www.ky6la.com
"No Good Deed Goes Unpunished"
"Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires, 911"
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Gorman
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RM-11306 Rant

Yeah, right. No chaos.

Only on 40m when the Canadian and South American SSB take out psk31 in the
states at this location.

Want to see what will happen if anything goes? Listen to 3585-3590khz in the
early evening when we are trying to have CW nets and have to put up with SSB
QRM.

That's!!! the future if a Canadian plan is put in place.

Howard, you've been given the IARU document references where the problems in
Region 1 were laid out in the September, 2005 Plenary. You can keep saying
there "is not any chaos" there but the published documents prove you wrong.
Denmark, Switzerland, and the RSGB all introduced documents stating
otherwise. How long are you going to keep your head in the sand along with
the ARRL?

tim ab0wr

On Thursday 26 January 2006 20:28, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> Actually I have had experience with Regulation by Bandwidth in Canada...
> and it works extremely well...  NO CHAOS
>
> And talking to many people in Region 1... there definitely is not any
> "chaos" that you would like to happen..
>
> yes the bandplans are restrictive in places but they are set be the amateur
> community and can easily be changed by the amateurs... to accomodate
> current communications volumes...
> __________________________________________________________
> Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LA
> Website: www.ky6la.com
> "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished"
> "Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires, 911"


Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to