that makes sense. Now if we can apply that to the endless winlink arguments on here, I'd give them a 590
 
John
VE5MU
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:05 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] RSQ signal reporting gains further support



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: vk3bgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 23, 2006 4:40 AM
Subject: [mixw] RSQ signal reporting gains further support
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello all,

You may be aware that the IARU Region 1 Conference September 2005
recommended that RSQ (Readability, Strength, Quality) replace the
traditional RST reporting format for HF digital modes.

A copy of the IARU recommendation and updated information on the RSQ
signal reporting scheme can be found at http://rsq-info.net/

A dedicated RSQ group has recently been established at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rsq_signal_reporting/ and you are
welcome to join a discussion there.

73, Graeme VK3BGH




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.0.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.12/266 - Release Date: 2/21/06


Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)





SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to