Rather than trying to bait him, if what he said is so important to you, why don't you go find his comment on the FCC site (that's not difficult) and READ IT ???
I voted to allow this discussion to continue, because despite all the personal attacks, there's been some good information from both sides, and it helped immeasurably when I crafted my comments to the FCC proposal. However, I'm getting more than a little tired of the IMMATURE, CHILDISH, INFANTILE baiting that does on when discussing this topic. Some of you really need to GROW UP. I don't know which side of this issue you (or anyone else) is on, AND I DON'T CARE. I read the messages here for the content, not to decide who is right or wrong. However, pestering someone because they had the temerity to actually view the issue in other than black and white terms, is in my opinion, beyond the pale. -- Dean On 2006-03-02 11:42, Bill Aycock wrote: > You were asked what you DID support, and you had said that you had > mailed a comment; did you support parts of both sides in that? > Bill-W4BSG > > John Becker wrote: > > >Ok Bill since you did not like that, try this. Some parts I do and > some parts I don't support. But does it really matter what I think. > > > > > >At 11:18 AM 3/1/06, you wrote: > > > > > >>John- This is NOT an answer to Daves' question. Did you support it > or not? > >>Bill-W4BSG > >> > >> > Bill Aycock W4BSG > Woodville, Alabama Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
