expeditionradio wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Paul L Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Wouldn't the better idea be to inform the hflink site of the
>>error rather than to issue a blanket "ignore" for the site?
>
>
> Which error, Paul?
>
> Bonnie KQ6XA
> HFLINK webmaster
> http://hflink.com

The original posting referred to problems with the 6 Meter
frequency on your website -- the follow up (the one I replied
to) pretty much recommeded ignoring anything on your website.

I just thought a better solution just *might* be for the
original poster to contact you with the details on the problems
with the 6 meter frequency than to follow the 'ignore' advice.

Reading through the newsgroups, it's obvious that there are a
few different opinions around, and that it's not likely that
we'll ever get 100% consensus on everything -- but I'd sure
like to see agreement on things where we *can*.

The original posting was
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

73,

-ps



Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)





SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to