I wonder when the Pactor III patent runs out? Then it is fair game
for all?
Ken N4VSD
--- In [email protected], doc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is then the protocol that unless one specifies
> Pactor II or Pactor III that one always means
> Pactor I?
>
> That would be helpful for me to know. I was
> wondering if I told someone Pactor that they
> might be calling on II or III and I would not
> hear them with a I-only setup.
>
> Thanks! doc
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > NO Sir.........The AEA is a verrrry old AEA Multimode Terminal Unit
> > that can handle PACTOR I only insofar as PACTOR is concerned.
> >
> > I got mine in 1991, in California.
> >
> > Doc KD4E http://bibleseven.com Wrote:
> > I am guessing that the AEA PK232MBX PACTOR handles
> > Pactor I & 2 but not 3?
>
> --
> Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e http://bibleseven.com
> Ham Links: http://bibleseven.com/hl.html
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
| Ham radio | Craft hobby | Hobby and craft supply |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
