ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 07:34 PM 6/22/2006, expeditionradio wrote: <snip> >So, as I pointed out in the beginning, what you are suggesting really >equates to the assumption that "all channels are busy channels". In >other words, there is no reasonable possibility of "channel is clear" >indication available all, because your circular reasoning precludes >it. So how is it possible for any QSOs to happen, if no one can get >past the circular reasoning of "all channels are busy channels"? <snip>
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** You must be talking to some other W6WRT. I never said or hinted at any of the above, and that goes for the rest of your post too. I see a great future for expeditionradio as a political spin-meister. The elections are coming up, so you'd better send out your resume. I'll be glad to vouch for your abilities. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
