A question for you, Patrick: in your opinion, is the public
documentation for Pactor 2 and Pactor 3 sufficient to allow you to
build your own implementations?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In [email protected], "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> >Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time
> >for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet
> >to packet that must be maintained?
> The second proposal is the good one.
>
> >Is it possible that one could write a sound card program that
could monitor Pactor II/III
> >transmissions even if it can't interoperate with the SCS TNC?
> If the (detailed) specifications of Pactor II and III were public,
it would be possible to monitor these transmissions (but not work
them, for the same problem as for Pactor 1).
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
