--- In [email protected], John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 09:38 PM 10/12/2006, you wrote in part: > > >I'm just wondering why we don't see more use of 85 or some other > >narrower shift in amateur use. > > > I think that is because there is still a lot of non computer RTTY > equipment in use today. I myself still use a machine(s) for RTTY > and the HAL ST-6 TU. > > I really don't see a need for a change. After all there are less using > RTTY now then there was ten years ago. > > Daddy always said "if ain't broke don't try to fix it or replace it". > > John, W0JAB > You could use that same argument to say we should have stuck with 850 shift back when it wasn't broke. And looks like 850 shift is going to be illegal with the new FCC rules, so you could retune your 850 Hz filters in the ST-6 for 85 Hz.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
