Hello Ken,
 
These modes (PAX/PAX2) have a protocol close to AX25 (between AX25 and Pactor 1), with a modulation close to Olivia and closer to Contestia.
 
The modulation is described on my help (RX/TX modes selection and their descriptions) and the protocol (in french) is downloadble from my site (http://f6cte.free.fr).
 
>As in can they be used within the packet radio network?
It's different from Packet because it is not compatible and because I have limited the number of repeaters to 2 (as I think it is sufficient as the lowest S/N is – 10 dB for PAX and – 7 dB for PAX2).
The use of repeaters decreases drastically the throughput but it is sufficient to send APRS position or to send a message to a Pax responder (if any).
 
73
Patrick
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:58 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Kantronics, Kam XL

Are these modes X25 compatable?

As in can they be used within the packet radio network?

This is something we are currently looking for to help increase and
replace the 300 Baud HF standard that has been used for far too long
now within the packet networks.

At present we are looking at Q15X25, but I was told that PAX2 might
have a better throughput in poor signal conditions.

Regards,
Ken
.-.-.

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > About Pax/Pax2, some weeks ago a Ham told me about adding these
modes in
> > the Multipsk_Client program. This program (source and .EXE available
> > from my site) permits to interface with Multipsk through a TCP/IP
link
> > in almost all modes, Multipsk becoming a sort of TCP/IP modem. So
I have
> > modified Multipsk (for the next version (4.1.1) to issue) and
> > Multipsk_Client (version 2 to issue) to interface in Pax/Pax2
with the
> > minimum of commands and controls ("Connection state", "Connect",
> > "Disconnect", characters RX and TX), so it will be possible to see
> > Multipsk as a TCP/IP modem (for MS PC only of course).
> > Hence, it could be used for data transmission, ASCII characters if
> > necessary, Outlook Express interface for mails, etc.....because
the bits
> > could be managed individually from an exterior program (connected to
> > Multispk (becoming a sort of "black box") through the TCP/IP link).
> > 73 Patrick
>
> My apologies to Patrick, it serves me right to read
> and reply to E-mails in a rush with a 4yr old hooting
> in one ear and a pounding thunderstorm on the steel
> roof hammering the other ... on top a yet another too-
> short night's sleep!
>
> I misread PAX/PAX2 as referring to Pactor/Pactor2.
>
> Please disregard.
>
> --
>
> Thanks! & 73,
> doc, KD4E
> ... somewhere in FL
> URL: bibleseven (dot) com
>

__._,_.___

Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)






SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Ham radio antenna Ham radio store
Digital voice Digital voice recorder mp3

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to