Only from the League's lawyer, silly. That's as good as it gets. Anyway, does anyone really want a response directly from the FCC, for Cat's sake?! Not I, dear sir. Especially after their recent Uni-Bus or whatever that crash was (HI).
Here is the League's strategy: Ask them for specifically what you want. Document it. If they don't respond with a "NO", you have it. Some members of the WG didn't like that passive approach. They wanted all changes to published in the Federal Register. Fat chance of that ever happening. ;o( Thus the split up started with many of the WG members stating "Who needs this kind of support?!". Unfortunately, that is as good as it gets sometimes. The FCC just doesn't give a &#$% about Amateur Radio, but Hams don't generally understand that....yet (HI). 73, John K8OCL ----Original Message Follows---- From: Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: New ARRL Petition Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:19:02 -0600 How is this a response from the FCC? It looks like an opinion from a lawyer, and the FCC was copied. Where is the FCC response? 73, Mark N5RFX At 11:13 PM 12/14/2006, you wrote: >Attached is the response we got from the FCC via the ARRL: In effect, it >states >as long as nobody complains, we (the FCC) don't really care what you do!
