Andy, I understand the FCC to say: "We will fix the oversight by shifting all prior spectrum privileges from 3620-3635 kHz down to 3585-3600 kHz."
This matches the suggested pactor channel table for Oregon that I created back on November 29th. Just a hunch. ... Duane N7QDN --- In [email protected], "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Duane, I don't quite "get" their meaning.. > > "The ARRL argued > that the 75 m band should not have been expanded > below 3635 kHz, in order to protect automatically > controlled digital stations operating in the > 3620-3635 kHz portion of the 80 m band. The FCC > concluded that these stations can be protected by > providing alternate spectrum in the 3585-3600 kHz frequency segment" > > Is the FCC saying that the auto-controlled digital operators do not > need protecting? > > Andy. > > --- In [email protected], "dshults" <n7qdn@> wrote: > > > > Completely removing the CW requirement may not have been the best > > move, but this better-late-than-never correction was asked for > > and expected... > > http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC- 269012A1.pdf > > > > ... Duane N7QDN > > >
