Hello Andy,

In Region 1, 14073 KHz will be OK for transmissions with bandwidth < 500 Hz, 
but not 7073 or 3573 KHz (respectively SSB and CW frequencies). I think 10143 
KHz must be OK for everyone?

Frequencies for digital beacons would be a good thing, but with a Video ID 
and/or a RS ID before each transmission it would be better so as to permit 
identification by other Hams.

73
Patrick



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andrew O'Brien 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:59 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Establishing digital calling/beacon frequencies ?


  Should we consider trying to establish calling or beacon frequencies 
  for the non-PSK31, non-RTTY, non-ALE, digital modes? I'm thinking 
  along these lines because I'm having to dial between 14072 and 14110 
  on 20M for those few opportinties to catch MT63, Olivia, MFSK16, 
  Hell, PSK63, PAX2, DominoEx, Throb, Chip64, etc, etc. 40M is a 
  similar "chore". If I park on ,say, 14075 ...with a wide filter I 
  can hear some of the folks that start up but often miss the guys that 
  are riding high on 14108.5

  I wondering if we could informally establish a calling frequency for 
  MT63, Olivia, MFSK16, Hell, PSK63, PAX2, DominoEx, Throb, where we 
  all agree to less than 20 second CQ calls and 60 seconds taken to 
  coordinate a move to a free frequency. Ideally I would love to have 
  an APRS-type beacon system where we can see who is on frequency via 
  our maps, and then move people off the freq to arrange QSO's , all 
  control operated not unattended beacons. My recent 300 baud packet 
  tests and PAX2 tests suggest that these two modes are not robust 
  enough fo weak signal detecting. Olivia would be idea but is slow 
  for beacon-type work. I guess we could establish it so that any 
  digital (data) mode could be used to "beacon" with, but perhaps 
  encourage nothing more than 500 Hz wide signal . I would probably 
  beacon with 16/500 Olivia. 

  Any thoughts on this? What would be a good 20 , 40, and 80M 
  frequency? We would need one that all IARU regions could use, one 
  that most ham license classess can access, one that is not common for 
  others to CQ on. One that does not have a lot of automated PACTOR 
  traffic, and ideally one that is outside the usual RTTY contest 
  range . Suggestions ?

  How about 14073, 7073, and 3573? These would be the radio dial 
  frequency , all USB, AF frequency standard would be 1000 Hz.

  Would they work for most parts of the world? "73" would be easy to 
  remember! 
  Of course, we would refrain from beaconing if the frequency is in use.

  Andy K3UK.



   

Reply via email to