looks like something that would be perfect for an outfit like MFJ.

73
harv

On 1/29/07, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  For now there is not enough volume for other sales, but eventually we
can expect it to be available. One proposal had been suggested (but I
don't think implemented) to require a buyer to pay $200 for two laptops
and then they would get one and the other would go to a developing nation.

I like the idea of the product being sent, rather than any money, which
is often syphoned off by corrupt regimes.

The one problem with this particular laptop is that it would be too
underpowered for amateur digital programs. Of course it would be OK as a
modest terminal.

73,

Rick, KV9U


Per wrote:

>A few highlights from the specs:
>
>* nominally consumes less than two watts, can be
>recharged by human power
>* Power: 2-pin DC-input, 10 to 25 V, -23 to -10 V
>* 7.5 inch, 1200x900 pixel, TFT screen
>* Experience shows that the laptop components most
>likely to fail are its hard drive and internal
>connectors. XO has no hard drive to crash and only two
>internal cables. For added robustness, the machine's
>plastic walls are 2.0mm thick, as opposed to the
>standard 1.3mm.
>* Mass storage: 512 MiB SLC NAND flash, high speed
>flash controller
>* CPU: AMD Geode [EMAIL PROTECTED] <GX-500%401.0W>
>* Audio: Analog Devices AD1888, AC97-compatible audio
>* Line output: Standard 3.5mm 3-pin switched stereo
>audio jack
>* Microphone: Standard 3.5mm 2-pin switched mono
>microphone jack
>* 3 Type-A USB-2.0 connectors; SD Card slot
>* Runs customized Fedora Core 6
>
>Detailed specs with pictures:
>http://laptop.org/laptop/hardware/specs.shtml
>
>Cost: $100
>
>The catch ? Its only for children in developing
>nations and no commercial sales planed.
>Does anyone know of some other laptop resembling this
>?
>
>73 de Per, sm0rwo
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________________
>Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
>in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
>http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to