> Paul L Schmidt, K9PS wrote: > Now, if someone hadn't confused the regulation-by-bandwidth rulemaking > proposal by putting unrelated changes in automatic control in the same > proposal, it might have been successful. Had it been, we'd be able to be > talking to someone on SSB, and blast them a digital file during the QSO > without having to change frequency to the data sub-band. And it *wouldn't* > make any difference what kind of information you were transmitting via > a particular mode... But all the outcry over the automatic control changes > proposed at the same time left us as with the status quo -- the antiquated > regulation that doesn't fit the current technology.
Can you draft a request for a sensible change? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
