I discovered that http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz doesn't take you to the exact URL.
I think the URL is: http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/xlinrad-deb.htm or perhaps http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz/dttspw3sz.htm Walt/K5YFW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kd5nwa Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 5:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Can I get a rig with MORE? I downloaded the code from the SVN a couple of days ago and I'm wondering what will the Radio core will do, I don't need a detailed explanation just some broad strokes. At 05:15 PM 2/15/2007, you wrote: >Walt: > >Frank, Eric, and I have specfically answered all of your questions about >the Linux support. It is completely controllable under Linux now >especially for those who have no need for fancy radio GUI's. For those >that need GUI's there ARE GUI's and more will be coming. > >Roger Rehr has painted the road with crayola crayon especially for you: > >http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz > > >but the Linux code does not have the polished presentation of the >Windows version of code AND IT DOES NOT SUFFER FROM ITS >LIMITATIONS. It is poised to take off now. > >There are several approaches to take such as dttsp-shell (available >from Edson Pereira) or the java GUI done by John Melton or usSDR gui >done by Jonathan Naylor. Frank and I are not interested in doing >this GUI work. We are interested in support anyone who wants to do >the GUI work. > >Bob >N4HY >(coauthor DttSP with AB2KT) > > > > >DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: > > Peter, > > > > IMHO, the SDR-1000 has some of the best specs. out and is the > most configurable transceiver on the market. I have seen the > insides of the transceiver several times and the construction looks good. > > > > But note that it is only controllable using MS NT (maybe), W2K, > XP but I understand that there is a problem controlling it with > Vista. According to Felx Radio there is third party software to > control the SDR-1000 with Linux but I'll be darned if I can find > anything that gives steps 1, 2, 3, to take, to download, compile > the application or configure the radio. > > > > If a manufacturer claims that there is 3rd party software but > can't tell you where it is, then I think they should not claim that > there is such software and let it go at that. For that reason I am > leery of buying hardware that makes such claims. > > > > I have seen demonstrations of the SDR-1000 and I have used the > TS-1000/2000 series radios and the SDR-1000 is most impressive > against the Yaesu radios. > > > > 73, > > > > Walt/K5YFW > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter G. Viscarola > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:30 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [digitalradio] Can I get a rig with MORE? > > > > > > I work digital modes (PSK, RTTY, MFSK, Olivia, etc) almost exclusively. > > I also have a pretty low noise environment, living out in the > country and with my antenna (a dipole) almost 100' from the nearest > RF noise source. Note that upgrading my antenna system is really > not an option at this point for a whole lot of reasons. > > I presently have a TS-2000 and I like it a lot. I like the > ability to use the IF DSP to narrow the passband from each side to > isolate the signal I want. I've been pretty successful with it, > too. Given my modest setup I'm rapidly closing-in on my first 100 > for DXCC, after being on HF for only about 4 months. > > Could I gain some sensitivity/selectivity/better filtering by > upgrading my rig? What rigs might folks suggest? How about the > SDR-1000? Better? Worse? Something else? > > I'm relatively new to HF, so I'm looking for some elmering > I suppose -- Is my rig doing as well as any? Or, is a significant > step up possible? > > Again... I'm interested strictly in digital mode > performance. And, again, while I'd *like* to put up a tower with a > beam (and I *know* the old adage about 1 dollar spent on antennas > is worth 100 spent in teh shack), that just can't happen (for any > price I can pay) given my location. > > Thanks for your opinions, > > de Peter K1PGV > > > > > > __ > > > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster > telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > > > Our other groups: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, >TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair >"Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows >how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest." - Piet Hine > > > > >Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster >telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >Our other groups: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Cecil KD5NWA www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!) Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Our other groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 Yahoo! Groups Links
